|
|
Post by MsPoet on Oct 16, 2002 13:05:23 GMT -5
I am so glad that I am not the only one that thought the two of them looked alike!!!  Donna |
|
|
|
Post by Ari on Oct 16, 2002 14:54:39 GMT -5
romana.... are u the gurl that puts herself in the pics with CC??? if so....that's hilarious!!!! ;D ;D Haha no, that's me. |
|
|
|
Post by Angelamyte on Oct 16, 2002 15:24:37 GMT -5
then ari... why did u steal my pic?? ;D    |
|
|
|
Post by Ari on Oct 16, 2002 19:10:05 GMT -5
then ari... why did u steal my pic?? ;D Please tell me you're being sarcastic? |
|
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Oct 17, 2002 7:40:32 GMT -5
yeah, those letters cover his kissable lips but I love the picture nevertheless cause he has such a strong presence on this one, those eyes, very very impressive and very Riddle indeed. Any hope that Rowling brings Tom back, like Voldy found the fountain of youth in his search for immortality and has become young again? Lets face it, CGI Voldemort from the first movie is a crap, Tom Riddle from the second is really all young Dark Lord should be. They better find a way to bring Tom back cause snake-faced Voldy isn`t creepy by adult standards and CGI can`t replace actor ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by MsPoet on Oct 17, 2002 14:36:26 GMT -5
What a wonderful idea Romana.....maybe...just maybe,...JK Rowling will see Christian and like him so much maybe she'll write him into the 6th or 7th books! Donna |
|
|
|
Post by Rachel on Oct 17, 2002 17:19:04 GMT -5
That's a good think to think ;D I'd love for Tom to be in future books, it'd be awesome. *nod nod*
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelamyte on Oct 17, 2002 21:25:20 GMT -5
well, Tom Riddle (the character) might be in the future BOOKS...but, the actor that plays Tom Riddle...probably will be too old...try 30 years old (give or take 6 years for the three books to come out and the movies and all that crap...look at how long it's taking for OotP...lol) and ari...i was joking...lol ;D hehehehe... |
|
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Oct 18, 2002 7:36:22 GMT -5
Well, Voldy wouldn`t be 16 either cause harry would be 16-17 so Vold could be Tom in his late 20s early 30s. Admit it people, Tom is creepier than snake-face because his it`s creepy when a good-looking guy is actually ugly inside.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rachel on Oct 18, 2002 14:11:04 GMT -5
Those are both true. Hey there's a slim chance that if Tom was in future books, Christian would be in the movie *cough* It does make sense that Tom couldn't be like 17 anymore.. soo.. yeah. There's just one thing and that's CC being 24. Oh well. We can dream.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelamyte on Oct 18, 2002 18:09:25 GMT -5
but...why would cc be playing voldy?? isn't he like some computer animated thing...and tom riddle, is the teenage version of voldemort...so, it wouldn't make sense to have one person playing two characters... ;D ;D
oh well...
|
|
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Oct 19, 2002 4:31:08 GMT -5
I think that Rowling should bring back Riddle because a) it`s logical now that he has both Harry`s blood and daddy`s bone inside his body which makes Voldy more human not to mention that ethernal youth is big deal for people chasing immortality which Voldy does, b) there are so many shady things about his youth like what really happened at the orphanaged that pushed him over the edge (must be worse than abuse Harry suffered from Dursely`s cause Tom can`t even say a word "Orpahange" but "that...that" which suggests whatever happened might be very dark - beating, sexual abuse,I leave it to your imagination) and c)love or lack thereof is a big thing that separates Harry from Tom - Harry had his parent`s love for a short time but it makes a difference while Tom never had it and therefore became a different person from Harry despite obvious similarity. I`m sorry but you can`t do loved-one-goes-good unloved-one-goes-bad thing convincingly if one of them is CGI crap. I love harry and Riddle interaction because it emphasizes that love changes people, cheesy thing which makes Voldemort a multi-dimensional villain rather than 2D one he would be without Riddle. Finally, Riddle/CC is hot!  |
|
|
|
Post by Rachel on Oct 19, 2002 11:30:13 GMT -5
Ooh, well I think all those reasons are something JKR should think about when she's writing the future books  But... the question is how could Riddle come back since the diary is well destroyed kind of? And then if you think about it Voldy doesn't have to go into Riddle form ( even though I'd like him to  ) to answer those questions and tell Harry things like that... soo yeah. |
|
|
|
Post by Ari on Oct 19, 2002 16:03:19 GMT -5
Ooh, well I think all those reasons are something JKR should think about when she's writing the future books But... the question is how could Riddle come back since the diary is well destroyed kind of? And then if you think about it Voldy doesn't have to go into Riddle form ( even though I'd like him to ) to answer those questions and tell Harry things like that... soo yeah. Well, Voldemort could have somehow captured Harry, and do a nice 'How I Became Evil' an Essay by Lord Voldemort peice, therefore doing a flashback to his beautiful Riddle days. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Angelamyte on Oct 19, 2002 18:51:35 GMT -5
Well, Voldemort could have somehow captured Harry, and do a nice 'How I Became Evil' an Essay by Lord Voldemort peice, therefore doing a flashback to his beautiful Riddle days. ;D how typical....the evil character spills his beans to the hero, right after he captures him..... hmmmm, i wonder how many times i've seen this scenerio in countless movies... that my friend, is the most unoriginal thing that people do in movies and books...but i doubt that CC would play TMR, even in that flashback....he'll be tooo old for the part... i agree with all you guys, but let's be realistic now... ;D |
|
Christian, do you like our future?
But... the question is how could Riddle come back since the diary is well destroyed kind of? And then if you think about it Voldy doesn't have to go into Riddle form ( even though I'd like him to 
) to answer those questions and tell Harry things like that... soo yeah.